CBF sends FIFA defense on suspended Brazil vs Argentina in qualifiers

Meet the opponents of the men's and women's soccer teams at the Tokyo Olympics

On Monday, the CBF sent its defense to the suspension decision of Brazil x Argentina valid for the qualifiers for the World Cup in Qatar. The document was sent to FIFA on the last day of the deadline. The disciplinary committee of world football’s governing body last week began proceedings to investigate the matter.

The information was initially disclosed and confirmed by UOL State. The CBF had six days to present its defense against the introduction of a disciplinary process by FIFA. The deadline would expire on Sunday, but, because it was a weekend, it was extended and FIFA accepted the document on Monday.

The CBF, through its legal department, produced a series of documents to prove the suspension of the match at the Neo Quimica Arena in So Paulo. It took only five minutes for agents from the Health Monitoring Agency (ANVISA) and the federal police to enter the arena to disrupt the game, which was later suspended.

In a document sent to FIFA, the CBF used records of pre-match meetings and reports from the duel referee, Jesus Valenzuela of Venezuela, and the match representative, Colombian Juan Hernández. The organization tries to show that it has done its part as principal in how to alert Argentina about the health regulations in force in the country.

The CBF had already issued two official notes regarding the episode, one of them more forceful, the day after the match. In this, the organization claims to have sent three notices to Argentina regarding sanitation rules on 5 July, 11 August and 2 September. At the same time, the CBF confirmed that it was present at the meeting that Anvisa met with Argentine and CONMEBOL representatives on the eve of the game.

See also  City walkers and sterling players suffer from racist messages after final defeat - game

At the meeting, the agency pointed to Argentina’s non-compliance with the rules and ordered the quarantine of players Emiliano Martinez, Emiliano Bendia, Giovanni Lo Celso and Cristian Romero. The quartet entered Brazil randomly because they had not informed they had been in the UK in the previous 14 days. According to Interministerial Ordinance No. 655 dated June 23, 2021, foreign travelers who have passed through the United Kingdom, South Africa, Northern Ireland and India in the last 14 days are required to observe a quarantine to prevent the spread of the new variant. of coronavirus in Brazil.

According to the Brazilian Confederation, Argentina failed to follow Anvisa’s guidelines during the meeting itself, with Brazilian officials explaining that after entering the country irregularly, four players should be in quarantine. According to Anvisa, the quartet also rendered wrong. Information about the health declaration form of the traveler.

The organization insisted that the Brazilian team did not leave the pitch at the Corinthians Stadium after Anvisa’s intervention, indicating that it could continue with the game, while Argentina did not return from the locker room.

In turn, Argentina claim that the Brazilian authorities are to blame for the suspension of the match, which, in their opinion, should lead to a punishment for the Brazilian team with a three-point loss in the qualifiers table. The argument should focus on outside interference, which usually causes the home team to be punished.

FIFA fits the situation in Article 14 of its Code of Discipline, which deals with games that have been abandoned or that have not been finished. The item provides as a minimum penalty of 10 thousand Swiss francs, which is equivalent to R $ 56 thousand. And you can define whether the match will be restarted or given as a defeat for one of the sides.

See also  Rayshard Brooks' Widow Hopeful LeBron James, NBA Boycott Sparks Transform

After establishing procedures for investigating the episode, FIFA stated that “both teams were asked to provide more information about the facts that led to the postponement of the match, which would be collected and then A thorough analysis will be done by the disciplinary committee”.

About the author: Sarah Gracie

Sarahis a reporter covering Amazon. She previously covered tech and transportation, and she broke stories on Uber's finances, self-driving car program, and cultural crisis. Before that, she covered cybersecurity in finance. Sarah's work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Politico, and the Houston Chronicle.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *