Matter is what makes the universe, but what is important with it? This question has long been difficult for those who think about it – especially for physicists.
Reflecting the latest trends in physics, my Fellow Jeffrey Eischen And I Explains an updated way of thinking about matters. We suggest that this is not the case Particles Or Waves, As has long been thought, but – more fundamentally – remains the case pieces of energy consent.
Five to one
Imagine the ancient Greeks Five building blocks of material – From bottom to top: Earth, water, air, fire and ether. Aether was the case that filled the sky and told about the rotation of the stars as seen from the point of view of the earth.
These were the first basic elements from which one could build the world. His views on the physical elements have not changed dramatically in nearly 2,000 years.
Then, about 300 years ago, Sir Isaac ton ton Presented the idea that the whole matter exists at the called points Particles. One hundred and fifty years later, James Clerk Maxwell Presented Electromagnetic waves – Intrinsic and often invisible forms of magnetism, electricity and light.
Particle mechanics served as the building block and the wave for electromagnetism – and the mass is established as the two building blocks of matter on the particle and the wave. Together, particles and waves became the building blocks of all kinds of materials.
It was a great improvement over the five elements of the ancient Greeks but was still bad. In a popular series of experiments known as Double-slit experiment, Light sometimes acts as a particle and sometimes acts as a wave. And while theories and the mathematics of waves and particles allow scientists to make incredibly accurate predictions about the universe, the laws are broken on the largest and smallest scale.
Einstein proposed a solution in his theory Normal kinship. Using the mathematical tools available to him at the time, Einstein was able to better explain some physical phenomena and solve a long-term problem. Disorders associated with roots and severity.
But instead of improving the particles or waves, he eliminated them because he proposed warping of space and time.
Using new mathematical tools, my colleagues and I have demonstrated a new theory that can accurately describe the universe. Instead of basing the theory on the warping of space and time, we considered that a building block could be more fundamental than a particle and a wave.
Scientists understand that particles and waves are antithetical to existence: a particle is a source of matter that exists at a single point, and waves are present everywhere except the points that make them up.
My colleagues and I thought it made sense to have a basic relationship between them.
Pieces of flow and frag will
Our theory begins with a new basic idea – that energy will always “flows” in space and time.
Think of an energy will that is made up of lines that fill an area of space and time, flowing in and out of that area, never starting, never ending and never crossing each other.
Working from the idea of the universe of flowing energy lines, we searched for a single building block for flowing energy lines. If we can find and define something like this, we hope we can use it to make accurate predictions about the universe on the largest and smallest scales.
There were many building blocks to choose from in mathematics, but we asked for one that had both particle and wave properties – centered like a particle, but also spread out in space and time like a wave.
The north was a building block that looked like the concentration of an energy sphere – like a star – the energy sphere which is the highest in the center, and it goes a little farther from the center.
To our surprise, we found that there were only limited ways to streamline the flow of energy. Of these, we found only one that works according to our mathematical flow definition.
We named it A. fra piece of consent. For mathematics and physics aficionados, it is defined as A = -⍺ / r where ⍺ is the intensity and r is the distance function.
Using Matter Reza’s piece as a building block of matter, we then constructed the necessary mathematics to solve the problems of physics. The last step was to test it.
Back to Einstein, linking omnipresence
More than 100 years ago, he turned to Einstein Two great problems In physics to validate Normal kinship: Occasionally-minor annuity Shift – or concession – in the Mercury cycle, And A small bend of light as it passes through the sun.
These problems were two extremes of the size spectrum. Neither the wave nor the particle theory of matter could solve them, but general relativity did.
The theory of simple relativity complicates space and time in such a way that Mercury’s trajectory must be converted to the amounts observed in astronomical observations and turned to light.
If our new theory were to have the opportunity to replace the particle and the movement with perhaps a more basic piece, we should also be able to solve these theories with our own theory.
To avoid the problem of Mercury, we modeled the Sun as a large stationary component of the Energy Reza and Mercury as part of the fra Reza of a small but still very slow Reza. For the bending-light problem, the sun was modeled in the same way, but the photon was modeled as a subtraction of energy at the speed of light.
In both cases, we calculated the moves of the moving pieces and got the same answer as predicted by the general relativity theory. We were amazed.
Our initial work demonstrated how a new building block is able to accurately model the body from large to small. Where particles and waves break, the pieces of the energy release block become stronger.
This piece could be the only possible ubiquitous building block from which to mathematically model reality – and to update the way people think about the building blocks of the universe.