Hundreds of people today obtain outside the U.S. Supreme Courtroom to rally in assist of the Deferred Motion on Childhood Arrivals application as the court docket hears arguments about DACA November 12, 2019 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla | Getty Visuals
The Supreme Court docket on Monday reported it will not hear a problem brought by the Trump administration to a so-identified as “sanctuary” regulation in California that was handed to limit the influence of the president’s immigration agenda in the point out.
The situation anxious a California law handed in 2017 that limitations how state and community regulation enforcement can guide the federal govt in immigration enforcement.
With particular exceptions, the regulation bars condition and area regulation enforcement agencies from informing the federal governing administration of an individual’s house address, get the job done address or date of launch from custody for the objective of immigration enforcement.
It also stops point out and community officers from transferring an individual into the custody of immigration officers without having a warrant.
The Trump administration sued California around the measure, alleging that it was invalid underneath federal law.
Solicitor Common Noel Francisco argued in court papers that the law’s “conceded intent to obstruct — and result of obstructing — federal regulation by way of its individual regulatory scheme helps make the condition legislation unenforceable.”
A federal district court dominated in California’s favor and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals affirmed the determination.
President Donald Trump, who is struggling with reelection in November, was elected on a assure to make the nation’s immigration rules more restrictive.
The circumstance is United States v. California, No. 19-532.
This is breaking news. Test again for updates.